Mrs. Vandekamp uses a
norm-referenced approach to grading, otherwise know as the bell curve. With Mrs. Vandekamp’s decision to use this
approach she creates a highly competitive learning environment within her
classroom. Her decision to grade this way has denied Dakota the 80% or better she deserves and has worked hard to
accomplish. This, in turn, took Dakota
out of the running for the Rutherford Scholarship. The scholarship was of great importance to
Dakota financially.Dakota’s actual achievement is
not truly represented by her final mark.
She worked hard, throughout her course, on all of her assignments and was
attaining grades higher then 80%.
Dakota’s final mark shows where she sits in comparison to her peers and
does not represent her true learning accomplishments.
Self Reflection
I think
criterion-referenced grading is a better grading practice because it is a true
representation of the student’s learning.
I don’t feel it is fair to grade students based on where they fit
academically amongst their peers.
Each student is an individual and
deserves to be treated as such. There is
always going to be diversity within a classroom, and I think it is my
responsibility as a teacher to make sure I am testing to the student’s
ability. This means making
accommodations for lower level learners (scribing, dictating, modifying the
number of questions on an exam, etc) and possibly challenging my higher-level
learners. I think it is up to the
teacher to promote success and downplay competition.
Student achievement and grades
should represent the learner outcomes as prescribed by the Program of
Study. I think if the students are
reaching the learner outcomes and are successful in assessment they deserve the
marks they earn. As a teacher, I will
strive to make my assessment tools relate directly back to the learner outcomes
and the POS. This will involve a great deal
of planning but with the planning comes the confidence that my assessments will
be reliable and valid.